home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
- From: flaps@dgp.toronto.edu (Alan J Rosenthal)
- Subject: Re: Subliminal Advertising (was: Little Me
- Date: 31 Mar 93 16:48:47 GMT
-
- >From The Straight Dope.
-
- On September 12, 1957, a market researcher named James M. Vicary called
- a press conference to announce the formation of a new corporation, the
- Subliminal Projection Company, formed to exploit what Vicary called a major
- breakthrough in advertising: subliminal stimuli. Vicary described the results
- of a six-week test conducted in a New Jersey movie theatre, in which a high-
- speed projector was used to flash the slogans "drink Coke" and "eat popcorn"
- over the film for 1/3000 of a second at five-second intervals. According to
- Vicary, popcorn sales went up 57.5% over the six weeks; Coke sales were up
- 18.1%.
- Vicary's announcement immediately touched off something like a nationl
- hysteria. Outraged editorials appeared in major magazines and newspapers;
- outraged congressmen drafted laws and made themselves available for outraged
- interviews. This was the year of Vance Packard's best-selling expose of the
- advertising industry, _The_Hidden_Persuaders_, and the public was apparently
- willing to believe anything about Madison Avenue -- 1984 was just around the
- corner.
- Overlooked in all the hullaballoo were Vicary's own relatively modest
- claims for his invention. It was useful only as a reminder, he said, and
- couldn't persuade anyone to do what they didn't want to do in the first place.
- But even he was probably overstating the case. While Vicary steadfastly
- refused to release any of his data (or even the location of the theatre where
- the tests were conducted), psychologists who had performed similar experiments
- gleefully contradicted his results. A weak stimulus, they said, produced a
- weak impression; the subliminal "message" was no more hypnotic than a slogan on
- a billboard glimpsed out of the corner of the eye. Moreover, Vicary's ideas
- were hardly new. A subliminal projector called a tachistoscope had been used
- during World War II in training soldiers to recognize enemy aircraft, while a
- book published in 1898 (_The_New_Psychology_ by E.W. Scripture) laid out most
- of the principles of subliminal response.
- Still, the panic over subliminal "brainwashing" continued. In January
- of 1958, Vicary agreed to conduct a publicly announced test over the Canadian
- Broadcasting Company stations. The message "telephone now" was flashed 352
- times during a half-hour show, but there was no noticeable increase in
- telephone use during or after the programme. Instead, the CBC received
- thousands of letters reporting unaccountable urges to get up and get a can of
- beer, to go to the bathroom, to change the channel -- not a single viewer
- correctly guessed the message. Since the technique apparently wasn't working,
- the advertising industry felt free to denounce it (and help repair some of the
- image problems brought on by Packard's book). Subliminal ads were banned by
- the American networks and by the National Association of Broadcasters in June
- of 1958. A proclamation that subliminal ads were "confused, ambiguous, and not
- as effective as traditional advertising" issued by the American Psychological
- Association finally laid the controversy to rest, one year almost to the day
- after Vicary's historic press conference.
- In 1962 Vicary granted an interview to _Advertising_Age_ in which he
- called his invention a "gimmick" -- the Subliminal Projection Company had been
- dissolved, and he was working in happy obscurity for Dunn and Bradstreet.
- Eleven years later, though, the subliminal pitch made an unexpected comeback.
- A commercial for a game called "Husker-Do" was found to contain the phrase "get
- it" flashed four times (one frame each) during its 60 seconds. The
- manufacturer, the Pican Corporation of Los Angeles, expressed horror and
- surprise, withdrawing the ads (which, of course, violated the NAB code) and
- writing the whole thing off to an overzealous copywriter in Cincinnati. But
- the company's scruples apparently didn't extend to countries where there were
- no regulations against subliminal ads: in 1974, the spots appeared on Canadian
- television. More outrage followed, and subliminal ads were quickly (if
- pointlessly) outlawed in Canada.
-
- --
-
- Now that I've typed that all in, could someone archive it?
-
- regards,
- Alan "words in quotation marks are not perceived consciously and thus can be
- construed as subliminal advertising: drink Coke" Rosenthal
-
-
-